The Supreme Court agreed Tuesday to hear arguments in a watchdogs lawsuit seeking public records about trillionaire Elon Musks Department of Government Efficiency.
The high court is intervening for a second time in Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washingtons case, which seeks access to DOGE records from its operations in the early days of President Donald Trumps second term. The Trump administration asked the court to hear the case.
Last year, the high court reined in a district courts order for the government to produce DOGE-related records to CREW. The high courts conservative majority concluded in June 2025 that U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper ruled too broadly in ordering documents to be turned over to the group.
CREW claims DOGE is a federal agency and therefore is subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT | DOGE employee shared Social Security data without authorization, DOJ filing reveals
The Trump administration argues that DOGE is exempt from FOIAs requirements as a presidential advisory body.
Cooper ruled in CREWs favor and ordered expedited processing of the groups records request. An appeals court panel also sided with CREW.
The Trump administration claims the panel ignored the Supreme Courts direction to consider separation-of-powers concerns and intruded on the autonomy and confidentiality of presidential advisers.
Subjecting advisory bodies to intrusive discovery triggers the very concerns that Congress sought to avoid by excluding presidential advisory bodies from FOIAs reach, Justice Department attorneys wrote.
The administration also says the appeals court impermissibly authorized the plaintiffs to take a sworn deposition of DOGE acting administrator Amy Gleason.
ELECTION NEWS | Elon Musks super PAC starts spending to help GOP in midterms, including Texas Ken Paxton
CREW says the appeals court fully complied with the Supreme Courts previous order. The group also asserts that the public has a right to know how DOGE helped the administration carry out a sweeping overhaul of government operations in 2025.
Undisputed facts in the public record including the Presidents statements confirmed that (DOGE) was wielding enormous independent authority across the federal government, its attorneys wrote.
In a statement Tuesday, CREW attorney Nikhel Sus said the lower courts have uniformly ruled that it is entitled to records that could help the court determine whether DOGE wields the type of authority that would make it subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
We will continue to pursue transparency for the American people, who deserve to know the details of the Trump Administrations efforts to unilaterally remake the federal government, Sus said in the statement.
